Select Page

LOS ANGELES.–Supreme Court’s conservative majority weren’t impressed with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s solicitor general Michael Dreeben’s arguments opposing 77-year-old former President Donald Trump’s presidential immunity. Without a loss of immunity, Democrats, the media and the Department of Justice have no case against Trump. Chief Justice John Roberts raised the key issue related to the Democrat, media and government case against Trump, whether or not zealous, politically-motivated prosecutors can illegally harass U.S. citizens by concocting fake charges in a grand jury and pursue unlawful prosecution? Dreeban opposes Trump’s presidential immunity claims because without it, Smith has no case against Trump for obstruction or for harboring classified documents. Dreeben was fully exposed as part of the Democrat, media and government conspiracy against Trump.

Roberts knows all-to-well what happened to Trump during his four years in office with fake charges brought by the government against Trump starting during his 2016 presidential campaign. Former President Barack Obama, rarely mentioned in the government’s case against Trump, authorized his Atty. Gen. Loretta Lynch in 2016 to sabotage Trump’s campaign against Democrat candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Roberts is onto the government’s abuse of power, weaponization of the Justice Department for the purposes of undermining Trump’s 2016 campaign, his four years in office, and now, once out of office, his life as a private citizen. But why, everyone asks, would the government need to erase Trump. Trump exposes massive fraud in the so-called deep state of Democrat bureaucrats seeking to advance the Party’s agenda.

Roberts in the three-hour oral arguments raised cryptic issues of a government conspiracy and weaponization against Trump. No Democrat, media source or government agency can admit to its treacherous use of the government for political persecution. Hillary used her fake Steele Dossier, fabricated opposition research, against Trump claiming he was a Russian asset, to waste years and millions on fake investigations. Roberts remembers the 22-month, $40 million Robert Mueller investigation of Trump that ended March 22, 2019 in Trump’s acquittal. But Democrats and the media persisted with the lies about Trump’s ties to the Kremlin. Now the same arguments are made about Trump’s ties to the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, claiming that Trump planned and orchestrated what Democrats called an “insurrection.” Roberts fully gets that DOJ’s case against Trump is another deep-state witch-hunt.

Democrats, the media and the Department of Justice concocted a case against Trump based on the findings of the House Jan. 6 Select Committee that concluded that Trump participated, planned and organized the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection, when, in fact, Smith has no evidence that Trump was involved in anyway. Yet the Department of Justice, through Smith’s solicitor general, argues that Trump lacks the “absolute” immunity to resist the government’s case against him. Robert sees the danger built into the DOJ that it has been and currently is used for political persecution. Smith knows that if the Supreme Court rules that Trump has immunity against the current witch-hunt, then Democrats, the media and the government’s case against Trump falls flat. Solicitor Gen. Michael Dreeben brought up none of the allegations or charges against Trump.

Roberts gave the Court watchers all the clues they need to know that Smith’s cases against Trump would not go forward anytime soon. “As I read it, It says simply a former president can be prosecuted because he’s being prosecuted,” Roberts, said, showing that he’s very concerned with deep-state, politically motivated prosecution, in other words, government weaponization. All the media, especially CNN, MSNBC, New York Times and Washington Post are guilty of fake reporting for years about Trump’s alleged ties to the Kremlin. Now all the reporting about Trump is focused on his alleged ties to the Jan. 6 mob that vandalized the Capitol. Dreeben did his utmost to convince the conservative majority that that Trump didn’t have the immunity to avoid the government’s latest witch-hunt. Roberts showed he’s onto the Democrat, media and government conspiracy.

No one in the Obama administration, including the president himself, was held accountable for abuse of government agencies for political persecution. All of Obama’s Department of Justice, FBI, CIA and National Security Agency [NSA] worked in overdrive during the 2016 campaign to undermine Trump and get Hillary elected. Only voters turned back the Obama conspiracy to help Hillary get elected. Now Trump faces all the fake charges again, this time for the Jan. 6 rabble-rousers that let the mob get out-of-control on Jan. 6. Trump was charged by 84-uyear-old former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) with “incitement of insurrection,” specifically to use the insurrection against Trump to prevent him from running in 2024. When that was shot down by the Supreme Court March 4, it was another brick that fell from the Democrat, media and government wall out to get Trump.

About the Author

John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He’s editor of OnlineColumnist.com and author of Dodging The Bullet and Operation Charisma.