LOS ANGELES.–Secretly recording Supreme Court Chief John Roberts and Associated Justice Samuel Alito at the Supreme Court Historicial society last week, Laurne Windsor broke every ethical standard, and maybe the law, to record a private conversation without full disclosure. Describing herself as a documentary film maker, Windsor called the clips posted on X “undercover audio,” showing the extent of left wing treachery to score political points at anyone who disagrees with her leftist political philosophy. “People in this country who believe in God have got to keep fight for that—to return our country to a place of Godliness,” Windsor said. “Well, I agree with you, I agree with you Alito said. Windsor hoped to show that Alito holds radical views about his Christian faith and would do anything to fight atheists and others that disagree with his faith, setting Alito up as a religious zealot.
Windsor at other points in talking to Alito represented her as a Roman Catholic. “I don’t know that we can negotiate with the left in a way that, like, needs to happen for the polarization to end. I think that it’s a matter of like winning,” Windsor said, baiting Alito into a more forceful response to the current atmosphere challenging religion. “I think you are probably right,” Alito tells Windsor. “On one side or the other—one side or the other is going to win. I don’t know, I mean, there can be a way of working, a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised. They really can’t be compromised. So, it’s not like you are going to split the difference,” Alito told Windsor. Windsor set Alito up to show how his religious extremism affects his impartial Supreme Court work.
Windsor wanted to show for all to see the kind of religious fanaticism that prevails with certain justices on the Supreme Court, those like Alito and Thomas, that hold certain dognmatic views on Christian faith that impacts their Supreme Court decision-making. Windsor thought she could bait Chief Justice John Roberts, a Roman Catholic, into the same kind of religious war arguments. Roberts can be heard on tape rejecting Windsor’s argument that the Supreme Court should be “guiding” the U.S. as a “Christian nation.” Showing the innocence with which justices discus personal views about religion, Windsor’s corruption knows no limits in trying to make the justices look like Christian zealots. “Yeah, I don’t know that we live in Christian nation. I know a lot of Jewish and Muslim friend who would say, ‘maybe not.’” “And it’s not the oourt’s job to do that. It’s our job to decide the cases a best we can,” Roberts said.
Windsor was rewarded at CNN for her treachery, trying her best as a leftist to discredit the conservative voices on the Supreme Court, something done frequently in liberal press. Windsor should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for violating the privacy rights of Supreme Court Justices she secretly recorded, all to show that leftist radicals must work to replace conservatives with justices that hold leftist views on race, religion, gender, sex or anything else. Windsor’s attempt was to disparage conservative justices who hold certain Christian view, assuming that they affect their Supreme Court decision-making. CNN and other liberal networks, run or hosted by LGBT-plus folks, seek to put more leftists on the court by convincing 81-year-old President Joe Biden to pack the court, actually increase the size of the court to promote a leftist agenda.
Liberals that highlight ethical breaches on the high court with justices like Clarence Thomas receiving gifts from certain donors. Windsor wanted to hear from Samuel Alito’s wife Martha-Ann who apparently raised in 2021 an upside down American flag at her Virginia property and an “Appeal to Heaven” flag in her New Jersey home. Martha-Ann has been quoted saying she wants to raise “a Sacred Heart of Jesus flag because I have to look across the lagoon at the Pride Flag for the next month,” according to Windsor’s secret tapes. But whatever Martha-Ann thinks, she’s entitled to her own view whether she’s married to a Supreme Court Associate Justice or not. Martha-Ann obviously has the feistiness of her own convictions, doesn’t want to be cancelled or muzzled because of her husband’s job. Windsor wanted to show the Alito’s bigotry toward the LGBT-plus community.
Leftist treachery to expose bias against the LGBT-plus community is an outrage that should be condemned by anyone that cares about privacy rights and the Constitution. “We condemn the surreptitious recording of Justices at the event, which is inconsistent tithe entire point of the evening,” said James Duff, executive director of The Supreme Court Historical Society. “Attendees are advised that discussion of current cases, cases decided by sitting justices, or a Justice’s jurisprudence is strictly prohibited and may result in forfeiture of membership in the Society,” condemning Windsor’s obvious subterfuge. However far the liberal press goes during an election year, voters see firsthand the ugly treachery used to advance a leftist agenda. Whatever Martha-Ann Alito’s personal views about flags or anything else, she entitled as free woman to her own opinions.
About the Author
John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He’s editor of OnlineColumnist.com and author of Dodging The Bullet and Operation Charisma.
