Taking a parting shot after 74-year-old President Donald Trump pardoned 62-year-old Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn Nov. 27, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan dismissed the case. But instead of letting the pardon stand without comment, Sullivan showed his undeniable Democrat bias against Flynn, saying that doesn’t mean Flynn wasn’t guilty. Sullivan knows that 70-year-old Atty. Gen. asked him to dismiss the case because it lacked legal merit June 1. While Sullivan says today the dismissing the case doesn’t mean that Flynn wasn’t guilty, it certainly doesn’t mean that he was guilty. Barr asked the DOJ to review Flynn’s perjury charges carefully, concluding that Flynn was set up by former rogue FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka by disgraced former FBI Director James Comey. When Barr asked Sullivan to dismiss the case, it wasn’t because he though the case had legal merit.
Yet countless articles from the New York Times and Washington Post cited a litany of federal prosecutors about how outrageous Barr’s decision was to drop Flynn’s case. Partisan Democrat hacks and their friends in the media whined about how unprecedented it was to dismiss a federal criminal case. But was really criminal was the fact that no one at DOJ, FBI or National Security Agency conspirators from the Obama White House were punished from a phony witch hunt to invalidate the 2016 presidential election. Former FBI Director acted righteous talking about his Operation Crossfire Hurricane, investigating Trump and his campaign on bogus probable cause from former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s paid opposition research AKA “The Steele Dossier.” Comey thought nothing of using fake probable cause to seek warrants to wiretap Trump officials from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act [FISA] Court.
Sullivan’s too partisan to admit that he was a political pawn in the Democrat conspiracy to frame Trump and his campaign for colluding with Russia. Flynn was guilty of nothing, including his innocent, inconsequential discussions with former Russian Amb. Sergey Kislyak during the transition period. When former President Barack Obama and Joe Biden met in the Oval Office with Comey and many other in their National Security Team, they decided to go after Flynn for violating the 1799 Logan Act. On Jan. 4, Comey sent Strzok and Flynn to the White House to interview Flynn, something breaking with White House protocol. Flynn for some unknown reason openly talked to both agents without legal counsel. Flynn was charged Dec. 16, 2017 by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller for a single count of making a false statement to FBI agents Strzok and Pientka Jan. 4, 2017.
What led Barr to dismiss Flynn’s case was declassified handwritten notes by Strzok asking whether they should set Flynn up in a perjury trap. Obama’s former National Security Adivser Susan Rice “unmasked” Flynn conversations with Kislyak and new they were innocent and inconsequential. Yet Obama and Biden still ordered the FBI to set Flynn up for violating the Logan Act. Obama and Biden held a grudge against Flynn before they fired him Aug. 7, 2014 as Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. So when Barr reviewed Flynn’s case, he could see no only was Flynn inappropriately targeted by the DOJ, there was nothing wrong with his conversations with Kislyak. Sullivan couldn’t contain himself writing a 43-page order to dismiss Flynn’s case because of Trump’s Pardon. Sullivan said his dismissal didn’t mean that Flynn was innocent, even though Barr said the case lacked legal standing.
Sullivan felt compelled to talk about Flynn’s guilt or innocence because, like so many other partisan Democrats and the media, it was a political witch hunt not a legitimate legal proceeding. Barr determined that Flynn did not in fact give false testimony to Strzok and Pientka, they were engaged in illegal entrapment. “The history of the Constitution, its structure, and the Supeme Court’s interpretation of the pardon power make clear that President Trump’s decision to pardon Mr. Flynn is a political decision, not a legal one,” Sullivan said. But Sullivan knew that Atty. Gen. Barr determined after careful review that Flynn’s prosecution lacked proper predicate for a criminal proceeding. Sullivan’s statements prove that he was part of the Democrat and media conspiracy to prosecute anyone remotely connected to the Trump administration on false charges of Russian collusion.
Flynn’s case was the tip of the iceberg when it came to the government’s illegal spying activity on Trump and his 2016 campaign. Sullivan proved in his final opinion on the case that he was part of the criminal conspiracy against the Trump campaign. Former members of the Obama administration, including the president and the vice president, got away Scott Free from an active conspiracy to prevent Trump as the GOP nominee from becoming president, then, once president, illegally prosecuting him and his White House based on fraudulent charges from Hillary’s dossier. “Because the law recognizes the President’s political power to pardon, the appropriate course is to dismiss the case as moot,” Sullivan said. Sullivan knows that in Flynn’s case the Attorney General said the case lacked legal merit. What does Sullivan have to see to admit he presided over a Kangaroo Court?
