When the so-called “whistleblower” report hit the airwaves Sept. 26, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had plenty of time to review the contents, since the actual report was written July 26, one day after 73-year-old President Donald Trump held his infamous phone call with 41-year-old Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In the secret whistleblower complaint, it alleges that Trump tried to withhold military funding to Ukraine unless Zelensky agreed to investigate former Vice President and Democrat Presidential Candidate Joe Biden and his 50-year-old Hunter. Whistleblower statutes are designed to protect employees from disclosing corruption, graft or larceny in government offices or corporations, like drug companies. Former U.S. defense contractor 36-year-old Edward Snowden considered himself a “whistleblower” when he stole and fled the country with classified government documents.
Whistleblower statutes, protecting employees from revealing venal or criminal acts, were not designed as a shadowy process to allow political parties to play dirty tricks. Snowden shows how it’s easy to abuse the whistleblower statute, where there’s a fine line between Snowden’s treason, stealing classified National Security files, to call yourself a good Samaritan. When it comes to intel officials that heard second-or-third-hand info about Trump July 25 call with Zelensky, it’s convenient for Trump’s enemies in Congress to use it for impeachment. Congressional Democrats, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and House Oversight and Reform Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) have sought to impeach Trump since Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation started May 17, 2017.
When the March 23 final Special Counsel Report gave Democrats nothing to impeach Trump, they’ve looked under every rock to make it happen. For months after Mueller released his Final Report, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler and Cummings cherry picked the Mueller Report accusing Trump of “obstruction of justice.” When that didn’t fly, suddenly a “whistleblower” report emerges. When asked about the whistleblower report, Schiff denied he or his office had talked to the whistleblower Oct. 2. Then, Schiff admitted the whistleblower actually talked to his office last July, perhaps even getting guidance how to write the complaint. Trump calls the whistleblower’s actions “treason,” comparing it to Snowden or other thieves or government or military property like former Army intel analyst Chelsea (formerly Bradley) Manning courts martialed for espionage in 2013 for stealing classified military secrets.
Manning, like Snowden, considered himself a whistleblower, when, in fact, he was found guilty of violating the Espionage Act—a criminal guilty of treason. When you consider the history with Trump, former President Barack Obama’s FBI, Justice Department and National Security Agency [NSA] investigating Trump, the use of a “whistleblower” raises suspicions. FBI officials are currently under investigation by Atty. Gen. William Barr and U.S. Atty. John Durham to get to the bottom of the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Trump and his campaign, the day he announced fore president June 15, 2015. Before-and-after former FBI Director James Comey was fired by Trump May 9, 2917, he insisted the FBI had probable cause to investigate Trump. It turns out Comey used former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s opposition research AKA “the dossier.”
When you consider Obama’s National Security apparatus, including the FBI, was used to sabotage Trump’s presidential campaign, it’s no wonder Trump doesn’t trust the so-called “whistleblower.” Schiff’s inconsistency, saying he didn’t speak with the whistleblower before Sept. 26, raises doubts about his credibility. If Democrats under Obama set up Trump with an illegal counterintelligence investigation, they could create a phony whistleblower complaint. Democrats went into overdrive to find impeachable offenses once Mueller delivered his Final Report, essentially clearing Trump. Trump’s recent refusal to cooperate with the House impeachment inquiry speaks volumes about what Obama’s DOJ, FBI and NSA did to Trump to sabotage his campaign and presidency. Calling a snitch and whistleblower is a convenient way to legitimize unauthorized spying.
Whether there’s one, two ore more whistleblower complaints, they have to be weighed against the toxic political backdrop, where Democrats have a proven track record of setting up the Trump campaign and presidency. Calling spying “whistleblowing” attempts to make it legitimate, when in fact it’s pure corruption. No one knows the extent to which Schiff and his Democrat friends set Trump up for impeachment. Trump and his backers believe the whistleblower complaint is a continuation of the same hoax that linked Trump and his campaign with Russia. Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson admitted that the whistleblower had political bias against Trump. Atkinson couldn’t say whether or not the whistledblower’s complaint was coordinated with Schiff’s Intel committee, looking to impeach the president.
