Flowing like a mighty Mississippi River, anti-Trump propaganda from the New York Times reached new heights embracing 50-year-old former FBI Agent Peter Strzok, whose anti-Trump emails-and-text with his 40-year-old lover former FBI Lisa Page was uncovered after the 2016 presidential campaign. Strzok claims that his personal animosity toward 74-year-old President Donald Trump never compromised his work at the FBI, something so preposterous, so outrageous, so inconceivable that only the most anti-Trump partisan would believe it. Strzok and Page swore together to do everything possible to stop Trump from becoming president and, once president, to remove him from office. Even 75-year-old former Special Counsel Robert Mueller removed Strzok and Page from his investigation in 2018 once it became clear they both had published emails-and-texts denouncing Trump.
Strzok, who was fired by the FBI Aug. 10, 2018 for unprofessional conduct, is out with a self-serving autobiography titled, “Compromised,” continuing to make a feeble case that Trump was beholden to the Russian Federation. Mueller spent 22-monhts and $40 million, led by 62-year-old senior Department of Justice career prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, clearing Trump March 23, 2019 or his campaign of any link to the Russian Federation. Strzok, like his boss 60-year-old former FBI Director James Comey, swallowed hook, line and sinker former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s paid opposition research AKA “the Steele Dossier,” making wild, unfounded, unverified and outright fabricated allegations against Trump serving as a Russian agent. Strzok wrote an entire book to excuse his inexcusable behavior that led to his firing for cause by Deputy FBI Director David Bowdich.
Strzok’s book fits perfectly into the political agenda of the New York Times and other anti-Trump publicans seeking to smear Trump less than two months before the Nov. 3 presidential election. While Strzok got some publicity today, yesterday it was all about unverified accusations that Trump called U.S. war dead “losers” and “suckers” while visiting Paris June 10, 2018 to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of WW I. Embracing Strzok shows the extent of New York Times corruption, having previously embraced convicted felons against Trump, former attorney Michael Avenatti and former Trump personal Atty. Michael Cohen. Anyone willing to go on the record attacking, felons and all, get on the New York Times front-page. Seeing the Times endorse Strzok, a disgraced former FBI agent, shows the kind of desperation before the Nov. 3 presidential election.
Strzok is a known con artist, fired with cause because he’s unable to tell the truth or conduct his FBI job with any integrity. “Given what we knew or had cause to suspect about Trump’s compromising behavior in the weeks, months and years leading up to the election, moreover, it also seemed conceivable, if unlikely, that Moscow had indeed pulled off the most stunning intelligence achievement in human history: Secretly control the president of the United States—a Manchurian candidate elected,” Strzok wrote in his book. When you consider that the New York Times followed the same egregious propaganda against Trump for nearly four years, Strzok seemed like welcomed relief. But when you consider the distortions, outright lies, pure fabrications made by Strzok, you’d think the Times would be utterly embarrassed printing him. But no, the Times looks for its own vindication.
No U.S. newspapers published more un-sourced or anonymously source front-page stories tying Trump to the Kremlin than the New York Times. Embracing felons like Avenatti, Cohen, and con artists like Strzok is par of the course for the New York Times that has everything on the line in the 2020 election. They’re all in on pretending former Vice President Joe Biden is fit for duty, when everyone knows he’s suffering from age-related dementia, possibly due to his past hemorrhagic strokes. Yet Strzok’s the Times new hero because he validates four years of pernicious propaganda about Trump’s lies to the Kremlin. Strzok has nothing to say other than justifying his unprofessional, inexcusable conduct that got him fired at the FBI. Now he looks for a possible job in the Biden administration. Strzok’s comments in his book are so legally qualified, they amount to nothing other than pure conjecture.
New York Times disguises nothing when it comes to getting Trump out of office. They would sell their soul to the devil to get rid of Trump, including embracing a con artist like Peter Strzok, whose interests now is salvaging a disgraced career at the FBI. While he’s suing the Department of Justice for wrongful termination, Strzok should have resigned for his disgraceful relationship with Lisa Page, both conspiring on the job to sabotage Trump’s campaign. “We certainly had evidence this was the case [Trump the Manchurian candidate]: That Trump, while gleefully wreaking havoc on America’s political institutions and norms, was pulling his punches when it came to our historic adversary, Russia,” Strzok said. Written like true sophomore, Strzok can’t hide his utter nonsense, getting to preach to the New York Times choir. Strzok is the perfect match what Trump calls a “failed” newspaper.
