Disgraced former Democratic National Committee [DNC] Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fl.) lashed out a 66-year-old Roger Stone for his Jan. 25 seven-count indictment by 74-year-old Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Wasserman-Schultz apparently didn’t read the indictment, mentioning nothing about Stone’s alleged ties to the Kremlin during the 2016 presidential campaign as minor adviser to 72-year-old President Donald Trump. Wasserman-Shultz was readily paraded on anti-Trump cable network CNN, leaping to reckless conclusions about Trump’s Russian collusion. Fired by the DNC July 24, 2016, only two days after WikiLeaks released hacked DNC emails showing that Wasserman-Schultz conspired with former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to sabotage the campaign of 78-year-old Democrat presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Wasserman-Schultz, 52, unloaded on Stone, primarily to divert attention over her egregious acts while DNC Chairwoman. “The Mueller indictment shows that Roger Stone, at the direction of senior Trump campaign officials, willingly weaponized information stolen by WikiLeaks on behalf of Russia to help Donald Turmp get elected President,” Wasserman-Schultz told CNN. Wasserman-Schultz gets her facts mixed up, saying that WikiLeaks stole DNC emails implicating her in a conspiracy to sabotage Bernie’s campaign. Whoever hacked the DNC emails, they exposed a major fraud at the DNC, proving Bernie never had a prayer in 2016. When Hillary lost the 2016 race to Trump Nov. 4, 2016, she blamed her loss on former FBI Director James Comey, then, when that didn’t fly, on the Russians. Yet analysis of the 2016 race shows that Bernie supporters did not vote for Hillary.
Wasserman-Schultz’s unwarranted conclusion that Stone was responsible for the DNC hack can’t pass unnoticed. “The Mueller indictment really shows that the funnel is narrowing and the cinch is tightening a round the necks and getting closer and closer to the highest levels of the Trump campaign,” Wasserman-Schult\z said. Yet Wasserman-Schults knows that Mueller made no mention of any Trump collusion with the Kremlin to wing the 2016 presidential election. All Mueller pointed out was that Stone lied or mislead Congress on his emails or texts to his conspiracy-nut buddy Jerome Corsi with whom he expressed interest in talking with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Mueller acknowledges Stone may have misled Congress about his attempts to did up dirt on Hillary but there was no Russian collusion. Mueller said nothing about Stone “weaponizing” hacked emails or texts.
Wasserman-Schultz and her successor 59-year-old Donna Brazile did everything possible, by hook-or-by-crook, to get Hillary elected. Brazile also resigned from the DNC in disgrace Feb. 27, 2017 after getting outed for feeding Hillary CNN debate questions in advance. “This is the clearest evidence yet and the most specific arrow pointing directly at the highest levels of the Trump campaign that they colluded with Russ to elect Donald Trump, Wasserman-Schultz insisted. Wasserman-Schultz knows that Muller drew no conclusions about alleged Trump collusion, only that Stone perjured himself about digging up dirt on Hillary. No one in Hillary’s campaign or the mainstream press admits that Wasserman-Schultz was fired for cause once it came out that she deliberately colluded with the Hillary to sabotage Bernie. Mueller said nothing about Stone’s role in getting WikiLeadks hacked emails.
Wasserman-Schultz, while DNC chairwoman, did everything possible to elect Hillary, including give her a blank check on super-delegates, putting Bernie in the hole from Day-One. When you consider Hillary and the DNC paid FusionGPS for “the dossier,” implicating Trump as a Russian traitor, it’s ironic that Wasserman-Schultz blames Trump for Russian hacking the DNC emails or those of Hillary’s former campaign Chairman John D. Podesta. Hillary, not Trump, ponied up the big bucks to obtain Russian dirt on Trump. Whatever Stone did or didn’t do to warrant Mueller’s indictments, he didn’t hack the DNC or Podesta’s emails. Once Russia hacked and WikiLeaks dumped emails July 22, 2016, Stone was curious to find out more dirt on Hillary from any sources. It’s entirely normal for political rivals to dig up dirt on their rivals, regardless of party.
Wasserman-Schultz did everything possible today to divert attention away for the real fact why she was fired at CNN and the DNC. She was fired because she conspired with Hillary to stack the deck against Bernie. Hillary lost the election because Bernie’s supporters were so disgusted with Hillary and the DNC, they either didn’t vote or they voted for Trump out of protest. Leaping to unwarranted conclusions about Stone’s indictment, Wasserman-Schultz hoped to divert attention away from her egregious abuse as DNC chairwoman. “I certain;y was a victim of that, as well as my staff and the people of the United States of America,” Wasserman-Schultz said. Waserman-Schulz and other anti-Trump Democrats don’t like that Mueller hasn’t found any evidence of Russian collusion. Jumping to unwarranted conclusions shows how far Wasserman-Schultz will go to take the heat off herself.
