After spending nearly four years pushing the Russian hoax, insisting 74-year-old President Donald Trump colluded with the Kremlin to win the 2016 election, the New York Times is at it again, this time saying Russia wants to target 50-year-old Hunter Biden, son of 77-year-old former Vice President and Democratic nominee Joe Biden. Reporter Julian Barnes suggested that intel officials, without naming names, think that Hunter’s now in Russia’s crosshairs to discredit his father’s campaign. Pushing more outrageous conspiracy theories shows that the New York Times will do anything to see Joe win the presidency. Joe could have committed rape, larceny, even murder, but the Times wouldn’t cover it up, protecting the Democrat presumptive nominee in his question to beat Trump in November. Spreading more lies about Russian interference in the 2020 election, the Times stops at nothing to defeat Trump.
Because Biden’s story of his involvement in Ukraine is not covered in the New York Times, Washington Post or any other liberal print or broadcast outlet, the Times wants to push the fake narrative that Biden’s story in Ukraine is purely Russian disinformation. It’s no joke that Hunter landed himself, with Joe’s help, a $83,000 a month job at Ukraine’s Burisma Holding’s board, an specialty he knew nothing about. Hunter admitted to ABC’s “The View” Oct. 15, 2019 that it was probably not good judgment to take the Burisma Holdings job. Hunter also acknowledged in that same interview he would not have gotten the job without his Vice President father. Joe at the time was heading former President Barack Obama’s Ukrainian corruption task force, something that prevented Ukraine from developing more international business. Yet Biden capitalizes on corruption for his son.
MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace, a rabidly anti-Trump critic, preached to the choir, asking Barnes about Russian disinformation. “Russia uses these disinformation campaigns to deflect from what they did in 2016,” Barnes said. “A lot of intelligence officials believe the sort of Burisma accusations that are being revived are once again trying to obscure what Russia is up to,” promoting more Russian propaganda to avoid dealing with Joe and his son’s time in Ukraine. Barnes knows it’s not disinformation that Joe landed Hunter a lucrative job on Burisma Energy’s board.. There’s no facts in dispute when it comes to Joe helping Hunter get the Burisma Energy Board job. Wallace, Barnes and other Democrat-friendly reporters know that if Biden’s fingered for corruption, it won’t help his campaign to defeat Trump Nov. 3, 2020. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) sent a letter July 20 to FBI Director Christopher Wray asking about Russian disinformation.
Biden’s activity on behalf of his son Hunter was no disinformation. When you consider the New York Times or Washington Post refuses of cover Hunter’s story, it’s convincing proof of U.S. media disinformation, protecting Joe’s approval ratings before the 2020 election. Failing to report on defamatory stories on Biden in Democrat-friendly broadcast or print outlets proves egregious media bias. Showing the extent of New York Times disinformation, Barnes explained himself. “The only remedy that really works is a the resilience of a population, and a population can only be resilience if they know what’s going on . . “ Barnes said. If you can believe it, Barnes says the only hope is for voters to believe the New York Times disinformation, not facts about a real story the paper refused to cover. Hunter’s 83,000 a year job in Ukraine exposes Joe’s egregious corruption, exploiting Ukraine for his family’s gain.
Showing that spreading disinformation, namely, fake news stories, is a specialty of the New York Times that spent nearly four years spreading Trump’s unfounded, spurious and defamatory Russian collusion hoax. Even after it was debunked by their hero Robert Mueller in the Special Counsel’s Final Report March 23, 2019, the Times finds ways to vindicate itself from its own pernicious propaganda. “So much of this stuff is secret, falls into bitter, partisan divisions, but it’s important for voters not to be affected by the disinformation campaign . .” Barnes said. If the Times sees a story harmful to its candidate, they brand it foreign disinformation. What they’re really doing is spewing disinformation to protect their candidate from egregious corruption and malfeasance while running Obama’s anti-corruption task force in Ukraine. New York Times knows Hunter’s story is going to come out soon.
Democrats and media are committed to seeing Biden get elected at all costs. More so than Democrats, the media has its credibility riding on defeating Trump. If the same thing happens in 2020 that happened in 2016, Democrat-dominated media outlets will be disgraced again. Pretending that Biden’s Ukraine story is Russian disinformation allows Democrats and the New York Times to discount Republican allegations about Biden’s obvious corruption. When Biden boasted Jan. 23, 2018 at the Council on Foreign Relations that he threatened to withhold $1 billion in funds from Ukraine unless 54-year-old former Ukrainian President Poroshenko fired prosecutor Viktor Shokin, it should have been headline news—but it wasn’t. Shokin was investigating Hunter’s employers, Burisma Holdings. To Democrats and the New York Times, Joe and Hunter’s story is Russian disinformation.
