Select Page

As 71-year-old Special Counsel John Durham unravels the Russian hoax, it leaves egg on the face of many broadcast and print news outlets that readily jumped on the anti-Trump bandwagon, all because it was promoted by Democrat Party. Durham’s probe won’t even touch today’s infiltration in mainstream broadcast and print media by the Democrat Party. What he’s uncovering in his probe is that the press was the vehicle exploited by Democrat operatives to promote the fake Russian narrative that harassed former President Donald Trump over the four years of his presidency. Key Democrats in Congress worked closely, constantly leaking fake information to the press which, in turn, readily printed and broadcast anti-Trump propaganda and disinformation. Durham’s now uncovering that sources to the so-called Steele Dosseir, on which the FBI relied on to investigate Trump and his campaign, was fake.

Durham’s caught in the weeds, trying to unravel sources to the Steele Dossier were, in fact, part of the Democrat Party strategy to discredit the 2016 Trump campaign to help Hillary get elected. Durham can’t see the big picture of a monstrous conspiracy with the former Obama administration to allow the Justice Department, FBI, National Security Agency [NSA], Central Intelligence Agency [CIA], and other agencies to discredit the Trump campaign. All Durham can do is catch certain low level Clinton or Democrat operatives in covering up their role in feeding the Steele Dossier propaganda and disinformation. Durham’s too stuck in his own lane to see that the Obama White House was deeply involved in the conspiracy to sabotage Trump 2016 campaign, all to help former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton get elected. Durhan’s probe focuses first on Hillary campaign operatives.

Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple stepped out of line, writing about Durham’s recent indictment of Igor Danchenko, a source to the Steele Dossier, alleging Trump engaged in a pee-fest with prostitutes in Moscow in 2013 when he hosted the Miss Universe Beauty Pageant. “The Danchenko indictment doubles as a critique of several media outlets that covered Steele’s reports in 2016 and after its publication by BuzzFeed in January 2017 . . . CNN, MSNBC, Mother Jones, the McClatchy newspaper chai and various pundits showered credibility upon the dossier without corroboration—and found other topics to cover when forceful debunking arrived in December 2019 via a report from the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz,” Wemple wrote. Wemple doesn’t cite the Washington Post, his employer, and the New York Times as the worst offenders.

Wemple’s days at the Washington Post are numbered to implicate his employer in the fake news media. Wemple surely knew four years ago that the Steele Dossier were fabrications, without sourcing, a common practice of the fake news. When no real sources exist, attribute the sourcing to an unnamed source. Durham now uncovers Danchenko as one of the fake sources, as was former Perkins Cole Atty. Michael Sussmann who forgot to tell the FBI he was paid by the Clinton campaign. Whatever Durham uncovers, he’s investigating low-level functionaries, low on the food chain compared former President Barack Obama, President Joe Biden, former Atty. Gen. Loretta, Lynch, former FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and others, all of whom participated the conspiracy to frame Trump.

Wemple’s critique comes five years too late, all because everyone in the Democrat-controlled media, including certain hosts at Fox News, all of whom repeated the utter rubbish promoted in the anti-Trump press, with the worst offenders by far the New York Times and Washington Post. So, when it comes to continuing the cover-up of the monstrous conspiracy the fake news must close ranks, just like the U.S. government that certainly has a lot to lose with Durham’s investigation. Fake News anchors like Rachel Maddow and fake elected officials like House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) must double down on the cover-up, claiming the Steele Dossier or whatever unnamed sources against Trump was all real. Wemple’s revelation comes years too late, since it was known since the 2016 Election Year that Hillary’s dirty tricks were gladly backed by the U.S. press.

Wemple’s wrong that any of the fake news, including his employer the Washington Post, will ever retract anything written using the fake Steele Dossier or citing countless unnamed sources in its reporting about Trump fictional ties to Russia. Even today the fake news continues to double down. Maddow said Durham is trying to ‘discredit the whole Russian investigation by arresting various sources for that investigation, to discredit the Steele dossier because so many people have been led to think that was the reason for the investigation.” Maddow shows exactly what Durham is up against as the Democrat Party and fake news industry continue to cover-up their role in promoting a monstrous conspiracy about Trump to help Hillary get elected in 2016. It doesn’t matter how many indictment Durham gets, Democrats and the fake news will always have their excuses.