When the bombshell New York Post relased its story Oct. 14 about new emails found between 50-year-old Hunter Biden and Ukrainian Bursima Holdings businessman Vadym Posharski, proving that 77-year-old former Vice President Joe Biden arranged Hunter’s Burisma job, the media gasped. Threatening to bring down Biden’s campaign, Facebook and Google censored the story, making it more difficult for millions of voters to see what happened. Joe’s campaign manage Jen O’Malley Dillon said “Hunter did nothing wrong,” something repeated often in the Democrat-friendly press. What’s different about the Post story is that it exposes the underlying evidence, namely, a hard drive from Hunter’s computer. Biden’s campaign immediately dismissed the story as Russian disinformation, essentially saying the entire story was bogus.
Unlike many unsourced or anonymously sources stories about 74-year-old President Donald Trump’s ties to the Kremlin in the 2016 presidential election, the New York Times and Washington Post are doubling down on discrediting the Post’s story. Much was already known about Hunter Biden’s ties to Ukraine through his convicted felon business partner Devon Archer, convicted of defrauding the Sioux Tribe, selling bonds and using the funds for his own piggy bank. Every time there are stories like the one in the New York Post that reflect negatively on Biden, the media attributes it to Russian disinformation. But when the New York Times, Washington Post and most broadcast stations printed anonymously sources stories about Trump alleged ties to Russia, it was never questioned as Russian or Democrat disinformation.
Hunter’s story in Ukaine has been widely reported not just in the New York Post but in numerous print and broadcast outlets. While it’s true the press shows bias against Trump, it’s also true they’re giving Biden a pass on his alleged corruption in Ukraine. It wasn’t that long ago that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) filed articles of impeachment against Trump because of an alleged attempt to solicit information about Biden and his son from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Pelosi and House Democrats impeached Trump over a possible quid pro quo with Zelensky. But when there was an actual quid pro q;uo with Biden and former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, the media turned a blind eye. Joe was recorded Jan. 23, 2018 telling the Council on Foreign Relations about his quid pro quo with Poroshenko.
Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations that he threatened to withhold $1 billion dollars in U.S. loan guarantees from Ukraine unless Poroshenko fired former state prosecutor Viktor Shokin who was looking into corruption at Burisma Holdings, where Joe’s son and his business partner took exorbitant salaries on the board. Now that the Post story broke, Facebook and Google censor the story, realizing it could upend Biden’s campaign. “It’s unclear if the story or the emails are authenticated much of the information provided in the New York Post’s account was widely criticized as being misleading,” said the New York Times.
Can you imagine the New York Times asking about “authentication” when they published untold numbers of unsourced or anonymously sources stories about Trump’s alleged Russian collusion?
New York Times demands “authentication” after publishing untold numbers of unsourced or anonymously sourced stories about Trump’s alleged Russian collusion. You’d think the New York Times would have tried to verify the fake Steele Dossier used by former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to discredit Trump in the 2016 election.
But no the Times accepted the bogus Steele Dossier as facts in evidence to writes the most defamatory stories possible about Trump for four years. Even after Special Counsel Fobert Mueller cleared Trump of collusion after a 33-mont, $40 million investigation March 23, 2019, the Times continued to spread disinformation. How the Times can sit in judgment of the New York Post is anyone’s guess. They’ve been guilty of more fake news than any other U..S. newspaper.
Protecting Biden at all costs between now the Nov. 3 presidential election, the U.S. media, Facebook and Google are all in doing everything possible to prevent voters from seeing egregious corruption Joe and his son Hunter engaged in Ukraine. Making the Joe-Hunter Ukraine scandal about Trump’s personal attorney former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the media has doubled down covering up Joe’s corruption. But regardless of whether you question the New York Post’s story offering email proof of Joe’s involvement with a Burisma official, the public needs only focus on Joe’s recorded statements Jan. 23, 2018 to the Council of Foreign Relations where he blackmailed Porshenko into firing Shokin for investigating Hunter’s employer, Burisma Holdings. Calling New York Post’s story Russian disinformation is the real disinformation.
