![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
JFK's Death Still America's Lingering Wound by John M. Curtis Copyright
November 17, 2013
Bracing for the
50-year-anniversary of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, the nation
suffers from the same confusion from that tragic day in Dallas Nov. 22, 1963. A
recent Gallup poll indicates that 61% of the public believes that JFK’s assassin
Lee Harvey Oswald was part of a wider conspiracy. For 59 years, the public
remains skeptical of the government’s 889-page Warren Commission Report handed
to President Lyndon Johnson Sept. 24, 1964 that fingered Lee Harvey Oswald as
the lone assassin. Public skepticism stems from the government’s secrecy,
sealing key documents for 75 years, despite attempts to unseal the records by
the 1966 Freedom of Information Act and 1992 JFK Records Act. Whether or not 98%
of the Warren Commission docs have been released, over 1,171 background
documents remain secret until at least 2017, when the JFK Records Act requires
all remaining docs to be released to the public.
While there are around 2,000 books written about the JFK Assassination, none has
the last word because key facts remain secret and may never be known. “It’s
possible that new evidence in the Kennedy assassination will never materialize.
The JFK assassination Records Collection Act, enacted in 1992, declassified 98%
of the unreleased documents in the Warren Commission Investigation, with other
unrelated assassination documents scheduled for release in 2017,” read the
Gallup poll report. Government secrecy over key facts-and-documents in the JFK
Assassination fueled generations of conspiracy theories, rejecting the official
Warren Commission Report. Government secrecy regarding the JFK Assassination is
the most compelling reason to believe that the Warren Commission Report was a
government smokescreen over the real facts. Other common sense facts known to
the public also fuel a host of conspiracy theories.
Whatever scientific facts surround ballistic evidence, including whether or not
a fourth bullet was fired from the Grassy Knoll or anywhere else, government
secrecy has been the No. 1 reason to fuel conspiracy theories and public
skepticism. When you consider that Oswald was shot-and-killed at
point-blank-range by 52-year-old Dallas nightclub operator Jack Ruby Nov. 24,
1963 in the secure basement of the Dallas Police Dept., it’s no wonder no one
believes the Warren Report. Nothing in the Warren Report accounts for how Ruby
breached all the Dallas Police, FBI, CIA and Secret Service security to get
point-blank access to Oswald. Backers of the Warren Commission Report, like
79-year-old former Los Angeles District Attorney and chief Charles Manson
prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi, repeat there’s no credible evidence to support
conspiracy theories. Bugliosi knows from his prosecutor’s days what happens when
credible evidence is withheld.
Calling anyone with a theory of Kennedy’s death a “speculator,” doesn’t add
credibility to the Warren Commission Report. If the Warren Commission had
material facts withheld from evidence, its conclusions too were speculative.
“Thus far, public documents not originally released in or part of the Warren
Commission’s Report from 1964 have not demonstrated that there was any kind of
conspiracy, yet clearly most Americans disagree with the official findings.
Speculating about who was really responsible for Kennedy’s death will likely
remain a topic of fascination for the American public for many years to come,”
said Gallup. No one can get to the bottom of the Kennedy Assassination without a
full disclosure of all the facts surrounding the incident, especially evidence
withheld from the Warren Commission. It’s possible that Johnson and former
Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren went to their graves without knowing all the
facts about the Kennedy Assassination.
Conspiracy-doubters like to cite some 42-groups and 214 possible persons
responsible for Kennedy’s death as proof of off-the-wall theories about
Kennedy’s death, including, (a) Lyndon Johnson, (b) the “military,” (c) “the
mafia,” (d) Oswald acted alone, (e) the CIA, (f) the FBI, (g) Russians and (h)
the Cubans, all of which have their backers. “We know that Oswald was in the
Russian embassy in Mexico City,” two weeks before the assassination, said
70-year-old former Boston insurance adjuster Dave Perry. After racking his brain
since 1976, Perry believes all the facts surrounding Oswald’s visit to the
Russian embassy haven’t yet come out, contained perhaps in the 1,141 documents
still on hold until 2017. Oswald’s presence in Mexico City two weeks before he
pulled the trigger in Dealey Plaza on the 6th floor of the Texas School Book
Depository seems relevant. Nothing in the Warren Commission Report talks about
Oswald’s meeting in Mexico City.
Whatever happened Nov. 22,
1963, the government fueled conspiracy theories by sealing official documents
regarding the JFK Assassination for 75 years. Whatever the 1966 Freedom of
Information Act or 1992 JFK Records Act did to disseminate more docs, too many
are missing to answer all the questions surrounding JFK’s death. Without all the
facts, it’s impossible to pinpoint the exact motive for killing Kennedy. Whether
Oswald pulled the trigger or not, his death two days after the assassination at
the hands of Ruby indicates that Oswald was silenced. Ruby’s 1967 death in
prison of a “pulmonary embolism” also remains suspicious. No one has any
explanation of how Ruby breached security and shot Oswald at point-blank range.
Figuring out who Oswald talked to at the Russian Embassy two weeks before he
shot Kennedy should get a lot closer to the real reasons behind JFK’s death.
Still withholding key pieces of evidence, the government hasn’t helped matters. John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc. (310) 204-8300 All Rights Reserved. |