![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
"The Social Network's" Moviemaking Triumph by John M. Curtis Copyright
October 7, 2010
David
Fincher’s “The Social Network” [Columbia, 2010] tells the sordid story behind
the Web’s most popular social networking site, Facebook, flashing the same
explosive energy conveyed by Ben Mezerich’s “The Accidental Billionaires,”
chronicling the fiercely competitive development of today’s Internet
billionaires. Fincher matches
masterful directing with screenwriter Aaron Sorkin, whose fast-paced punchy
dialogue faithfully depicts Mezerich’s secondhand descriptions of brash Facebook
founder Mark Zuckerberg, played with Oscar-like brilliance by 26-year-old
Queens-born Jesse Eisenberg. While
there are many fine performances, including Justin Timberlake’s portrayal of
Napster founder Sean Parker, Eisenberg steals the show, mirroring Zuckerberg’s
personality with frightening accuracy, though Mezerich and Sorkin had no direct
firsthand knowledge.
Above all else, “The Social Network” is a breakout role for Eisenberg,
producing one of finest performances of any young actor of his generation. Eisenberg’s tour de force
acting is matched by Fincher’s direction that moves the camera and sound like a
carefully orchestrated ballet, achieving near perfection in terms of its
tension, transitions and resolution.
Fincher faithfully tells the story of a young Harvard sophomore,
Zuckerberg, jilted by his girlfriend Erick Albright [Rooney Mara], for his
insensitivity, conveyed by as a cross between high-end autism and a more coldly
calculating opportunist. Reeling
from his rejection, Zuckerberg jogs endlessly through Harvard’s stately campus
before returning to his dorm-room laptop to publicly humiliate her with Internet
pictures and descriptions of her diminutive bra size. Zuckerberg manages to bang-out the
rudiments of Facebook.
Sorkin portrays Zuckerberg with the same gleeful obsession as conveyed by
New Yorker Magazine’s Malcom Gladwell’s description of Microsoft founder Bill
Gates in his NY Times best-selling book “Outliers,” consumed with programming
during his high school days, working endlessly on the University of Washington’s
block-long mainframe computer.
Sorkin succeeded in his vibrant, crisp dialogue of conveying the maniacal nature
to Zuckerberg’s obsession of retaliating against his Ex, while, at the same
time, creating the basic platform for Facebook.
Sorkin tells the story, in part, through flashbacks, conveying the brutal
depositions under withering cross-examination where Zuckerberg faces accusations
by Harvard’s Aristocratic Winklevoss twins, Tyler and Cameron [Josh Pence and
Armie Hammer], two strapping skullers, actually rowing Harvard to a sixth place
finish the 2004 Summer Olympics.
Without firsthand knowledge of Zuckerberg, Sorkin was forced to accept
the second hand descriptions by his former Harvard roommate and business partner
Eduardo Saverin [Andrew Garfield], who, according to Mezerich’s book, gave
Zuckerberg the so-called “algorithm” to initially build Facebook’s platform.
Because much of the story is told in flashbacks interrogating Zuckerberg in a
series of brutal depositions, it’s impossible to know the accuracy. In legal proceedings the truth lies
somewhere between the forceful assertions by plaintiffs and defendants.
According to depositions of the Winklevoss twins and Saverin of Mezerich’s
account in “The Accidental Billionaires,” Zuckerberg appeared cavalier, ripping
off the twins for Facebook’s idea and Saverin for a the technical formula. Sorkin extrapolates Zuckerberg as an
intense, brilliant, nerdy but opportunistic computer geek.
In Sorkin’s account, Zuckerberg becomes more cavalier from his
association with Napster founder Sean Parker, whose performance by Timberlake
gives “The Social Network’s” its second most compelling portrayal. Timberlake convinces viewers with a
gritty performance, worthy come Oscar time of supporting actor nod. Sorkin’s well-developed characters
were matched by equally convincing acting performances, only exceeded, in the
end, by Fincher’s brilliant executed direction, proving, once again, that
computer graphics and three-D don’t replace a well-written script, artistic
direction and superb acting.
Fincher’s camera work, shot selection, sound editing, scene transitions but
especially pacing make “The Social Network” an instant classic in unforgettable
moviemaking. It puts all the right
elements together, proving good filmmaking hasn’t changed.
Fincher’s “The Social Network” sounds a loud shot across Hollywood that
successful moviemaking starts with an outstanding screenplay, brilliant acting
performances and is tied together by masterful direction. No three-D or fancy computer
graphics were needed to tell a compelling story of American innovation,
jealousy, greed and ultimate redemption. Sorkin performed an exquisite balancing acting, letting viewers serve as their own jury
regarding who stole what from whom, creating the world’s most popular social
network. When you consider that
Zuckerberg refused to participate, Sorkin presented a fair-and-balanced view
extrapolated from multiple sources.
Thanks to the extraordinary acting—especially by Eisenberg—and exquisite
direction, “The Social Network” delivers iconic intensity to a riveting story
about one of the Internet’s most successful ventures. About the Author John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com and author of Dodging The Bullet and Operation Charisma. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Homecobolos> ©1999-2005
Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc. |