![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Obama Goes for Broke
by John M. Curtis Copyright
Sept. 6, 2009 Putting all his chips on the table, President Barack Obama plans to address a joint session of Congress trying desperately to save his health care plan. For months, the president’s plan has been hammered by the GOP, digging into an historic battle to defeat his ambitious plan. GOP opposition has been fierce, well coordinated and methodically planned, making the strongest possible case for the status quo. Opponents say Obama’s plan would wreck the American health care system, ushering in a new brand of socialized medical mediocrity. Apart from outrageous claims by former Alaska Gov. Sara Palin about “death panels,” Obama hasn’t articulated his plan well enough to respond to GOP charges that it would weaken, not improve, an already beleaguered health system. Barack’s detractors have made a powerful case that a government-run bureaucracy would be worse than today’s system.
Obama’s speech must do more than rehash old platitudes about the
estimated 46 million uninsured citizens, or, for that matter, go into a litany
about preventive medicine or streamlined cost-savings. Barack must stick to his health plan
and loudly proclaim the costs, premiums, co-payments, deductibles, waiting
periods, exclusions, limits, eligibility requirements, etc. All else is smoke. Before consumers jettison their
employer-based or individual and group private health plans they must compare
and contrast the costs and benefits.
Given the massive federal budget deficits now approaching $2 trillion,
taxpayers also have a right to know the costs of
Barack’s plan, especially to the federal Treasury, likely to pick up the tab. “This is different; it’s coming much
later in the game at a more difficult time than if he’d made it earlier,” said
Princeton University politics professor Julian Zelizer.
Barack doesn’t have much wiggle room to give an impassioned plea like
he’s done about race or national defense.
Health care is a different animal.
While he and the liberal wing of his Party show real zealotry toward the
subject, the vast majority of taxpayers simply want to know whether or not
they’re going to benefit. Apart from the uninsured audience, the bulk of his primetime talk will hit middle class
working taxpayers concerned about he bottom line. If Barack can reassure them that his
plan will exceed the benefits of most employer-based plans for a lower cost,
he’s go a shot of cracking through GOP propaganda. If he gives more platitudes, on the
other hand, his speech will kill what little chance he has of prevailing. Most consumers are asking at what
price are they willing to support reforming health care. If it benefits only the uninsured or
illegal population, he won’t succeed.
Barack’s high-wire act comes at a time of great uncertainty in the
economy. His national health care
plan comes with a high price tag, some estimates have ranged between $100-200
billion. Recent polls have indicated that a sizable majority opposed national health care, giving
Barack around 41% approval ratings on health care. His overall job approval rating is
hovering around 50%, 18% down from the early days after the inauguration Continued economic weakness
and rising unemployment have battered his ratings, despite improvements in stock
market and banking sector. When
former President Bill Clinton spoke before a joint session of Congress Sept. 22,
1993 to rescue former First Lady Hillary Rodham’s Clinton’s national health
plan, it marked the beginning of the end.
One year later, Hillary-care, as it was affectionately known, fell into
history’s dustbin.
Obama’s oratorical gifts won’t save him unless he can convince middle
class taxpayers they stand to gain by his health care plan. Everyone knows nationalizing health
care comes with a price. Barack
must reassure voters that his plan offers to reduce the heath care costs of
average citizens, while, at the same time, improving benefits. If he intimates that his plan saves
money by herding subscribers into a government HMO, he’ll encounter even greater
opposition. Barack wants the
so-called “public option” but hasn’t explained how the government’s supposed to
pay for national health care without raising taxes and rationing benefits. Clinton-era health care watchers
believe Hillary put too many details into the bill and frightened off the
Congress. “I am not going to deal
with the details of the president’s speech,” said White House chief strategist
David Axelrod, playing his cards close to the vest.
Stepping up the plate next Wednesday, Barack must deliver more than an
emotional plea. He must get down to
the brass-tacks of specifying boring details of his plan, including premiums,
deductibles, co-pays, exclusions, waiting periods, applicable groups, etc. He must clarify whether or not
undocumented workers would be eligible for benefits. “I don’t think anyone will leave the
speech without a strong sense of how he believes we should proceed,” said
Axelrod on CNN, refusing to offer any specific details. Everyone already knows how Barack
wants to proceed with national health care.
What people don’t know are nitty-gritty features of Barack’s plan that
taxpayers can compare with existing health care coverage. With the GOP winning the first
rounds in the health care debate, Barack must score a decisive knockout punch to
prevail. Anything short of a real
deal is bound to backfire. John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com and author of Dodging The Bullet and Operation Charisma. |
|||||||
Homene.net" target="_blank"> ![]() ©1999-2002 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc. |