![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Obama Offers 1967-Sized Carrot to Palestinians by John M. Curtis Copyright
May 22, 2011
Shooting himself in the foot politically, President
Barack Obama proposed May 19 that Israel should make peace with the Palestinians
by returning to the pre-Six-Day-War borders. A lot has changed since
Israel was ambushed by Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser, Jordan’s King Hussein and
Syria’s Hafez al-Assad with support from Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria, all
trying to fulfill Nasser’s promise of pushing Israel into the Mediterranean Sea.
When the dust settled June 10, 1967, Israel had captured Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula
and Gaza Strip, Syria’s Golan Heights and Jordan’s West Bank, all becoming
spoils of war. While Palestinians fought along side Egyptians, Syrians
and Jordanians, they didn’t lose one inch of sovereign territory, though many
Palestinians fled and were expelled from their homes inside Israel. All
U.N. or U.S. sponsored peace proposals involve swapping land for peace.
Obama’s recent proposal was a well-intentioned but failed attempt to bring
Palestinians to the bargaining table. Obama spoke in his May 19 speech
about ending Israel’s “permanent occupation,” referring to Israel’s spoils from
the 1967 War. Returning to the pre-Six-Day-War borders would necessitate
relocating about 300,000 Israeli settlers currently living in the West Bank.
Israel returned the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt in its historic 1978 peace accord,
negotiated by the late Egyptian President Anwar Sedat, late Israel Prime
Minister Menachem Begin and former U.S. President Jimmy Carter. Israel
built up Sharm el Sheikh on the Sinai Peninsula into one of the world’s premier
resorts before returning it to Egypt. Israel eventually left Gaza Sept.
12, 2005, only to find the terrorist group Hamas winning internationally
monitored parliamentary elections Jan. 26, 2006.
Hamas forcibly seized control of Gaza June 14, 2007, beginning the current
Palestinian civil war, where the late Palestine Liberation Organization leader
Yasser Arafat handed power to West Bank-based Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas.
Abbas has worked for years toward Palestinian statehood, accepting Arafat’s
prior U.N. agreements recognizing Israel’s right to exist. Hamas continues
to call for Israel’s destruction, regardless of current Egypt-brokered
reconciliation talks with Fatah. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
called Obama’s proposal “indefensible,” recognizing that rolling back to 1967
borders is unfeasible. All the false starts and delays in peacemaking have
left the Palestinians desperate for a quick-fix, including bypassing the peace
process entirely, going to the U.N. and declaring an independent state naming
East Jerusalem as its capital.
Barack’s proposal, though met harshly by Netanyahu, was a well-meaning effort to
get Palestinians back to the bargaining table. He’s playing good-cop with
the Palestinians, hoping to cajole them into discussions. Barack walked
out on a limb politically, after a game-changing victory of getting Osama bin
Laden May 2. “We accept two states based on the 1967 lines, with agreed
swaps . . . and we want Mr. Netanyahu to say this sentence,” said Palestinian
chief negotiator Saeb Erekat, speaking only for Fatah, not Hamas.
Fatah senior political advisor Nabil Shaath expects Abbas to endorse in quick
order a plan to get a vote in the U.N. for an independent Palestinian state.
Obama’s latest peace overture attempts to preempt Abbas’ attempt to get a U.N.
vote. Abbas knows that the U.S. will veto any U.N. attempt to declare an
independent state without negotiating with Israel. Obama knows that nothing can be done before Hamas recognizes Israel’s right to exist. U.S. and U.N. negotiators can’t create an independent state with 50% of the Palestinian people. Palestinians reacted harshly to Netanyahu’s rejection of Obama’s proposal. “It’s very clear that Obama’s attempt to [to restart talks] was shot down by Mr. Netanyahu,” said Shaath, promising to take the proposal for an independent state to the U.N. in September. Shaath knows that any such attempt would be vetoed by the U.S. in the U.N. Security Council. “Symbolic actions to isolate Israel at the United Nations in September won’t create and independent state,” said Obama. Without a Palestinian unity agreement with Hamas recognizing Israel’s right to exist, discussions can’t start. No one from Fatah can speak for Hamas while they’re divided. Palestinians must resolve their civil war first before talking peace.
Obama’s
latest peace proposal accomplished its goal of getting a rise out of Israel.
Invoking strong condemnation from Netanyahu placated the Palestinian street,
proving the U.S. isn’t biased toward Israel. Middle East experts know that
the U.S. and Israel are inseparable, especially when it comes to U.S. defense
and security. Palestinians have no real hand to play other than going back
to the peace table. Threatening to declare an independent state won’t go
anywhere. Nor will threatening to resume the Intifada or guerrilla war
with Israel win concessions or a Palestinian state. Palestinians need to
resolve their civil war with Hamas accepting Israel’s right to exist before
worrying about land-for-peace deals. Gone are the days when the U.S. can
support terrorists, however noble the cause. If a two-state solution is
possible, Palestinians need to stop making demands and get back to the table. John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Home || Articles || Books || The Teflon Report || Reactions || About Discobolos ©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc. |