![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Obama's Approval Ratings Keep Slipping by John M. Curtis Copyright
January 21, 2014
When
President Barack Obama slugged it out with Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 2008
campaign, Hillary warned voters that Barack’s lack of experience would catch up
with him. Handed favorable conditions by former President George W. Bush,
Hillary’s campaign knew early on that a Democrat would make it to the Oval
Office, though Clinton still had high hopes. Obama’s chief strategist David
Axelrod made all the rights moves down the stretch, acing Hillary out in key
Democratic primaries. When the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) and his niece
Caroline Kennedy backed Barack, he was on his way to the White House. What Teddy
and Caroline didn’t know was that the young-and-inexperienced Obama lacked the
wisdom to resist pressure from the entrenched liberal wing of the Democratic
Party led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid (D-Nev.)
Instead of letting his presidency evolve and work toward his promised goal of
more bipartisanship, Obama allowed Pelosi and Reid to railroad national health
care down the throats of a beleaguered Republican Party. Beaten down after years
of foreign wars and a crumbling economy, the GOP lost control of the House,
handing Pelosi and Reid their big chance to get national health care. When the
dust settled, Obama went along with the Democratic agenda, regardless of the
costs to his presidency. What Iraq did to Bush’s approval ratings, Obama’s
signature legislation did the same to Obama. Imposing his version of national
health care on the country, Obama broke his promise of bipartisanship, instead
adopting Pelosi and Reid’s take-no-prisoners approach. Obama’s credibility sunk
to new lows, with most moderates Republicans and independents turned off to his
message.
Looking at the big picture, Obama should have not imposed the Democratic health
care overhaul on the country, unless he had bipartisan support. His Jan. 18
speech on reforming the National Security Agency’s collection methods fell on
deaf ears, largely because it was too technical but more to the point because
Obama has lost relevance. When 30-year-old NSA contractor Edward Snowden leaked
classified documents June 5 to the Washington Post and U.K.’s Guardian newspaper
about the government’s spying programs, it horrified the domestic and foreign
press. Spying on private citizens and foreign leaders, like German Chancellor
Angela Merkel, rocked Washington and foreign capitals. Obama’s proposed
solution, putting National Security Director James Clapper and Atty. Gen. Eric
Holder in charge offers little hope that something can be done to deal with the
problem.
Even members of Obama’s own party weren’t satisfied with his suggestions to fix
what looks like egregious violations of constitutionally protected privacy.
“There’s a concern that we’ve gone too much in Americans’ privacy,” said Sen.
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman of the Senate Ethics Committee, sponsoring his
own legislation to restrict government access into private citizens’ data. “I
believe in going after the bad guys. But I also believe in checks and balances,
so you don’t have government run amok,” Leahy told Chris Wallace on Fox News
Sunday. Obama’s speech sadly makes a hero of Snowden, a garden variety snitch,
who’s been touted as a legitimate whistleblower in both left and right wing
circles. NSA contractors who violate their confidentiality agreements should be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, regardless of what they expose to
the public.
Obama’s sinking credibility came to head when he was forced to apologize for
promising citizens before implementing Obamacare they could keep their own
insurance and doctors. When insurance companies began canceling policies, it was
obvious that the president didn’t know what he was talking about. While there’s
some obvious benefits to the March 23, 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act, it’s caused havoc in the insurance marketplace. Not only hasn’t it
delivered on affordability, it’s caused insurance companies to cancel policies
and raise premiums. With no bipartisan support, it’s impossible to fashion
legislation to keep the insurance industry from gouging consumers. White House
officials didn’t anticipate all the complications, forcing the president to eat
crow on his promises. While there’s a chance things will work out, Obama’s
credibility headed south.
Hazarding opinions on legalized marijuana, Obama’s sunk to new lows trying to
find some relevance. Instead of providing guidance to his attorney general, he
offered his own personal views. “As has been well documented, I smoked pot as a
kid, and I view it as a bad habit and vice, not very different than the
cigarettes that I smoked as a young person up through a big chunk of my life,”
said Obama, displaying his lost relevance. With marijuana legal in Washington
State and Colorado, and with medical marijuana legal in 20 states, who cares
about Barack’s personal views? Baracks’ views on most subjects aren’t resonating
with a majority of Americans. High expectations have been tempered with the
painful disappointments, now losing him approval and precious credibility. More
folks talk today about New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie than Obama’s domestic and
foreign agenda. John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He's editor of OnlineColumnist.com.and author of Dodging the Bullet and Operation Charisma. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
Homecobolos> Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular">©1999-2005 Discobolos Consulting Services, Inc. (310) 204-8300 All Rights Reserved. |